Man of Steel Review

Theatres are awash with superhero movies these days. Batman, Spider-Man and The Avengers all had their go. It was only a matter of time before the one and only real superhero returned to the silver screen. Last time we saw him he was played by Brandon Routh in the unjustly maligned 'Superman Returns'. Now Henry Cavill dons the cape in 'Man of Steel'; a bold new take on the biggest hero of them all.

After struggling to reboot 'Superman' Warner Bros. decided to bring on board Christopher Nolan, whose 'Batman' films made a killing at the box office. The studio hoped Nolan would be able repeat his trick and make Superman cool again. They hired Zack Snyder, known for '300' and 'Watchmen', to direct. The approach would be as gritty and as realistic as possible. And thus, 'Man of Steel' was born.

The most striking aspect of this film is its exceptional cast. Henry Cavill had his work cut out for him. Christopher Reeve pretty much owned the role since 1978. Fortunately, Cavill makes for a good Superman despite lacking the Reeve's charisma. This time around Super's enduring love interest Lois Lane is played by Amy Adams. She's also a good choice but somehow there's a lack of chemistry between the two of them. You never feel quite convinced of the relationship between Lois and Clark.

The real power comes from the supporting actors. Russell Crowe and Kevin Costner in particular make a lasting impression as Superman's biological and adoptive father respectively. Both are most frequently seen in flashbacks and these moments are where 'Man of Steel' excells. By exploring various moments in Superman's past (both as Kryptonian born Kal-El and the All-American Clark Kent) the film manages to give the character some much needed depth.

Another high point is the film's villain. General Zod, played by Michael Shannon, is a classic bad guy. Like Superman, Zod is a survivor of the planet Krypton. He is determined to save the legacy of his people by taking over Earth. Shannon imbues his character with a maniacal intensity, this is one guy you don't want to piss off.

'Man of Steel' is filled with many superpowered fight scenes. So many in fact that you'll leave the theatre feeling as if you've been on Space Mountain one too many times. It's too bad because the wow factor wears off fairly fast. After the first two confrontations you get kind of tired and everything starts to feel and look like a cheap video game. The action is definitely the film's biggest weaknesses. It's so chaotic that it's easy to get lost in the mayhem.

It's hard to say if 'Man of Steel' will have the same impact on popular culture as Richard Donner's early  films. It certainly isn't as iconic. A good example is Hans Zimmer's musical approach to Superman. The German composer uses his familiar industrial techniques and creates a dense wall of sound. Never is this score as instantly identifiable as John Williams his orirginal fanfare. The sense of adventure is certainly lost in Zimmer's interpretation and the movie suffers accordingly. Williams made Superman fly, Zimmer makes him lumber along.

Not that Cavill's Superman deserves much fanfare because he's particularly bad at his job. During his scuffles with Zod and his cronies Supes is indirectly responsible for an uncomfortable amount of death and destruction. To add insult to injury the characters don't seem to care about the tremendous loss of life all around them. Superman and Lois even find time for some smooching during the film's finale, because there's nothing as romantic as making out in the middle of a mass grave.

Aside from these complaints 'Man of Steel' is a successful reboot that is sure to strike a chord with audiences. An action-packed and surprisingly personal take on the most famous of all superheroes. Hopefully, some of the issues of this movie will be addressed in the sequel. (Especially the aftermath of Superman's actions, that part still doesn't sit well with me.) All in all, Zack Snyder delivered the goods and successfully reintroduced Superman to audiences worldwide.

Jurassic Park 3D Review

It's been twenty years since Steven Spielberg released his dinosaurs upon the world. 'Jurassic Park' went on to become one of the greatest smash hits of all time. Audiences marvelled at prehistoric giants, resurrected by the latest filmmaking innovations. Now, the dinosaurs have returned to theatres all over the world. And Spielberg shows, once again, what a real blockbuster looks like.

Unlike the films I normally review, this is one that's been out there for a while. It is one of those movies I grew up with. 'Jurassic Park' has been in my life for so long that I can't even remember my first time watching it. And while nothing is as exciting as seeing a great movie for the first time, there's something grand in returning to a film you're intimately familiar with. 

That's exactly why I'm a huge supporter of re-releases like this one. Yes, they've added 3D and no, it doesn't really add anything. But as much as I loathe the 3D medium I'll never pass up on seeing a great film on the big screen. Unfortunately, it's a tradition that's far more prevalent in the United States than in Europe, or at least the part of Europe I reside in. What's wonderful about these re-releases is that it gives us a chance to share in our love for a film years after it's initial run. It's truly a celebration.

'Jurassic Park' started life as a best-selling novel by Michael Crichton. The writer drew upon speculation within the scientific community. The idea was that it would be possible to extract dinosaur DNA from musketoes trapped in amber. It's pretty much impossible of course, but it's as good an explanation as any. In a fine example of self-plagiarism Crichton placed the dinosaurs in a theme park; a setting similar to his own film 'West World'. 

The novel is noticeably darker than the film. Focusing more on the inherent dangers of wielding genetic power than the wonder of resurrecting an extinct species. This is why I prefer the film to the novel. While both are perfectly good stories, Spielberg's film releases itself from the cynisism of the source material. This change is most apparent in the character of John Hammond, played in the movie by Richard Attenborough. Crichton's Hammond only wants to get rich, while Spielberg's version comes off like Walt Disney's slightly disturbed brother. 

This optimistic approach means that we're allowed to experience the wonder of Hammond's creation. The moment we see our first dinosaur (a Brachiosaurus that's almost too big for the screen) is simply magical. It's a moment of cinematic beauty made possible through Spielberg's use of all his tools. There's the human element, the actors, and the visual effects and the wonderful musical score by John Williams. The combination of these elements creates a genuine moment of wonder. 

What's even more commendable is how the film switches from wonder to fear. 'Jurassic Park' isn't afraid to get scary. (Hell, it's not even afraid to get funny. Wayne Knight's run in with a Dilophosaurus never fails to make me chuckle.) The first T-Rex attack sequence is a revelation for someone who is used to seeing the film on a small screen. And it's not just the images. The cheap cinema seats were literally trembling at the sound of his roar. Even the shrieks of the frightfully intelligent Velociraptors seemed to cut right through you.

After twenty years the film hasn't lost much of its impact. You'd expect that the special-effects, which were revolutionary at the time of release, would look dated. Strangely enough, that's not the case. The computer generated creatures are still stunning. Which might be due to Spielberg's sparse use of CGI and the combination with Stan Winston's animatronics. Many modern filmmakers could learn a thing or two from 'Jurassic Park' and its use of computer generated imagery.

When you get right down to it 'Jurassic Park' is a perfect blockbuster. An entertainment machine. It's an example of a skilful director using all his tools to create wonder and excitement out of thin air. The film is one of the hallmarks of Steven Spielberg's career. It might not be as brutally effective as 'Jaws' or as transporting as 'Close Encounters of the Third Kind'. But it is still one of the most memorable movies in this director's long and diverse filmography.

Lincoln Review

Steven Spielberg has been busy on his Abraham Lincoln project for quite a few years. Initially he had Liam Neeson in mind for the role of the 16th President of the United States of America. But when Neeson claimed to be too old for the part, the role went to Daniel Day-Lewis. After seeing 'Lincoln' it's hard to imagine any other actor portraying this historical figure.

'Lincoln' is an important film. It's not just a history lesson, it's also an impressive dramatical achievement. A movie about the passing of the Thirteenth Amendment could've been boring as a rock. Fortunately, Spielberg and his screenwriter Tony Kushner find real suspense in the final months of Lincoln's life. It's not just the immense importance of abolishing slavery that captures our interest, nor is it the conclusion of the American Civil War, it's the story of a steadfast group of individuals. People who used, and sometimes abused, the political system to do the right thing. 

At the center of this group is Abraham Lincoln, who, by now, is regarded as an icon of democracy. In 'Lincoln' we see him with his family and we see him struggle with the death of his second son, Willie. These scenes, accompanied by John Williams' solemn score, are at the heart of the film. It's as if, for the first time, we are able to see past his historical  importance, and experience that Abraham Lincoln was very much a man like any other. There's a gentleness to this film that seems to be directly inspired by Lincoln's character. 

'Lincoln' will be remembered as one of the finest collections of performances in film history. Daniel Day-Lewis transforms into Abe Lincoln. From the moment he appears on screen his presence dominates the picture. He captures an intellectual, who is no stranger to suffering, nevertheless he has a fine sense of wit, demonstrated by the handful of shaggy dog stories he tells during the film. Sally Field is remarkable as Lincoln's grieving wife Mary Todd. Her confrontation with Tommy Lee Jones is one of the movie's highpoints.

All performances in 'Lincoln' are rock solid. Some of Hollywood's most prominent actors bring their best, and the dialogues, of which there are many, are impressive and suspenseful. But of all supporting actors Tommy Lee Jones stands out as the Radical Republican Thaddeus Stevens, a lifelong abolitionist. Surprisingly, the most  heartwarming moment in 'Lincoln' belongs to this tireless grouch. 

Spielberg's film will not appeal every viewer. Many scenes consist entirely out of political debates and conversations. The issues are no less important, but if you're not interested in history you won't find much to enjoy in 'Lincoln'. Aside from that, the film runs a bit too long. There's a moment, about ten minutes before the actual ending, which would've been a perfect conclusion. Instead, Spielberg choses to include the night of Lincoln's assassination. It doesn't ruin the film per se, but I do feel it's a missed opportunity to end the film  in a most touching manner.