Saturday, December 31, 2011

Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows Review

I’m kind of ashamed to admit that I didn’t see Guy Ritchie’s first ‘Sherlock Holmes’ film when it was in theatres. From the trailers I got a distinct ‘Pirates of the Caribbean feel with Robert Downey Jr. trying to pull a Jack Sparrow. Well, thanks to a few friends of mine I did get to see it about a week ago and guess what? I liked it!

The character of Sherlock Holmes, as written by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, seems like an unlikely source for a swashbuckling action film but strangely enough it works. Robert Downey Jr. and Jude Law are well-matched as the constantly bickering duo of Holmes and Watson. What I really liked between them was the way Watson didn’t only endure his partner’s eccentricities as he does in many other versions. Instead he seems fed up with Holmes and his attitude towards him seems simply defiant.


In ‘A Game of Shadows’ Holmes continues his search for the mysterious Professor Moriarty (Jared Harris) who’s machinations also kicked-off the first film. Like Lord Blackwood (Mark Strong) in the previous adventure Moriarty is an effective villain. And the best thing about him is that he comes straight from Doyle’s novels. He is Sherlock Holmes’ nemesis; his only equal. Demonstrated amazingly in a scene at the end where both consider how a physical fight between the two them would go down. 

Like any good sequel the tone is close to the original but at the same different enough to feel new. In fact, ‘A Game of Shadows’ feels like a James Bond film from the sixties. The story takes us from the UK, to France, blows up a part of Germany and closes in Switzerland. Holmes and Watson are in a desperate race to stop World War I from happening early.

Is it as good as the first? Sadly, no. ‘Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows’ is a cool film but it didn’t manage to correct some of the flaws of Ritchie’s first effort. You see, in a film about Sherlock Holmes you can always expect to be a few steps behind the hero. After all, he is a genius. The first film played with this notion with hectic interludes in which Holmes explains how he did what he did. These return but are too implausible to be taken seriously. For instance, there is a scene in which he sabotages a soldier’s rifle. But he does not explain how he knew which soldier would later be in a position to kill him and Watson. As I said he is a genius, not a psychic.

As for psychics, there is one in this film, apparently. Noomi Rapace plays a gypsy woman in search of her long lost brother. Rapace is a good actress but she’s wasted on this film. Her character was really quite forgettable. Instead Stephen Fry steals some scenes as Holmes’ smarter and weirder brother Mycroft.

Like we’ve come to expect from the director of ‘Snatch’ and ‘Lock, Stock and Two SmokingBarrels’ the action is beautifully shot, mixing slow-motion with sped-up footage to create a hypnotizing effect. Hans Zimmer is back to supply his brand of film music; hardly creative but still serviceable.

But ultimately the point of a sequel is to make more sequels. Would I mind? Not a bit, I like these movies and I’d love to see more of them. 

No comments:

Post a Comment